
Phishing is a fraud technique in which an attacker poses as a trusted party, such as a bank, a supplier, a government agency or a coworker, to get passwords, personal data, payment details or a money transfer. CISA describes it as a form of social engineering that uses email or malicious websites to solicit personal information. Today the message can also arrive by text, by phone call or through a QR code.
This article gives a clear definition of phishing, the main types (spear phishing, whaling, smishing, vishing, quishing), typical examples, the signs that give it away and what to do after a click. It ends with a section on phishing awareness training for employees, and explains why that training has to cover the phone.
The word comes from “fishing”: the attacker casts a lure and waits for someone to bite. The “ph” spelling is a nod to old hacker slang. In French, the same technique is called “hameçonnage”.
The French public assistance service Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr describes phishing as a fraudulent technique meant to mislead users into sharing personal or banking data by posing as a trusted third party. It lists fake emails, fake text messages and fake calls from banks, carriers, agencies and online shops.
Phishing is a form of social engineering. The attacker does not have to break into a system, because the victim hands over what a technical safeguard would refuse to give. To see why these messages work, read the psychological levers of social engineering.
The principle is always the same: a lure, a believable pretext, an action to take. What changes is the channel and how personalized the message is.
These forms are often combined. An email can ask you to call a number, or a call can announce a text with a code. A March 26, 2026 press release from Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr describes waves of phishing “by text, email or even audio calls”.
The three scenarios below are built to show the mechanism. They do not describe any real case.
Imagine an email that reads: “Your mailbox is full, reactivate your account within 24 hours.” The button leads to a page identical to the company login page. An employee types a username and password, and the attacker collects them at once.
Imagine a message sent to an accountant, using her manager's name and an attached invoice: “Can you pay this one before tonight? The supplier is threatening to stop delivery.” The tone is familiar, the request is plausible, and the urgency limits checking. For the phone version of this pattern, see CEO fraud by phone.
Imagine a text: “Your package is on hold, pay a $1.99 fee.” The fake site collects card details. A few hours later, a bank impersonation caller phones to “secure” the account. The first message prepared the second.
No single clue is enough. The accumulation is what should make you pause. CISA points to lookalike sender addresses, generic greetings, links whose destination does not match the visible text, poor grammar and unsolicited attachments pushed with false urgency.
Spelling mistakes are a clue, but recent messages are often well written. The right habit is not to hunt for a typo. It is to check the request through a channel you already know.
Do not sit alone with the doubt, and act fast. Here is a sensible order, based on CISA guidance and the French fact sheet from Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr.
To know what to write down when you report, see our incident reporting checklist.
Many organizations stop at fake-email campaigns, with a click rate as the indicator. That is useful, but it measures one gesture: clicking or not clicking. Real attackers change channel when the email fails.
On the phone, the situation is different. An email can be reread, forwarded and reported. A call demands an immediate answer, from someone who insists, flatters or threatens. Knowing that you should verify is not enough to do it when the voice is pressing.
The limits of fake-email campaigns are covered in our article on the limits of phishing simulation when the attack is a voice. The principle to keep: a verification habit is built by practicing it out loud, not by reading about it.
Searches for phishing training and phishing awareness training usually mean one thing: how to make employees stop clicking, and report when they do. A solid program combines four elements.
For that last point, Face Up lets trainers build their own role plays from their real cases, with an authoring tool. The learner speaks, by voice or on video, with a persona played by an AI: a fake bank advisor, a fake supplier or a coworker in a hurry. The learner then receives a debrief with quotes of what they said, and can replay the scene.
The full approach is described in our guide to security awareness training for vishing.
Classic phishing is sent in bulk, with a generic message. Spear phishing is prepared for one person or team, with real details about their job or contacts. It is harder to spot.
Yes, and it is called vishing. The channel changes, not the principle: a caller poses as a trusted person to get information, a code or a transfer.
No. Filters block part of the messages, not all of them, and they cannot see phone calls or always read QR codes. The person's action remains the last barrier.
Phishing usually refers to email. Smishing is the same trick sent by text message. Both rely on a link or a request that looks legitimate.
To train your teams to refuse a suspicious request, by email or by phone, book a Face Up demo.
From reading to practice.
Pick a real-life situation and talk to an AI persona, by video with an avatar or by audio call. 5 to 10 minutes, no account, instant debrief.
Try a scenario →